From the time we are born, society (being our parents, teachers, family, freinds and the media to a large extent) have a big influence in our lives and the way we think and act. This influence can give us a closed mind or an open mind depending on our experiences. If we are told from an early age that 2+2=5 by our parents and teachers etc, we will obviously believe them. So if someone comes along and tells us that 2+2=4, how are we going to react?  Obviously we are going to tell them that 2+2=5 and that is what we've been told for years by society, so our initial reaction is to disbelieve what we've been told.  This is a common reaction to subjects and issues that go against our own belief system.  If things do not fit into our own belief system than we denied them as they do not conform to what we have been "conditioned" to believe.

The sign of intelligence or maybe not!

How do you know if a person is confident with there level of intelligence? here's how. When I have asked someone in the past "what do you think of the New World Order", a person will react in either two ways. The first way will be to give his or her opinion without even considering the fact that they actually have not done any research on the subject and are just saying what they heard on the media or from friends and family.  The other side of this is that they lack confidence in their own intelligence so instead of saying "I don't know much about it", they prefer to cover it up by giving an assumed opinion based on no actual research or facts.  Not knowing something is somethings perceived by people as a "weakness or lack of knowledge" so to cover this "weakness" they will say that "it's a lot of crap" or a similar comment.

On the otherhand, the person who is confident with their intelligence will actually say, "I don't know much about it so I can't comment". This is a sign that this person is actually confident enough with their own level of intelect that they can admit confidently that they do not know about the subject. These are the fundmentals on how we think and act on a psychology level.  I'm not implying that you have to have a high level of intelect to understand this subject, you just have to be able to "think outside the box" and not be too quick to judge especially if you have done no research on the subject matter.

Since "man" is fundamentailty a lazy creature (proven again by psychology), he will always take the route of least resistence i.e. it's easier to say that something is "crap" rather than making an effort to question or query. As society makes us more lazy with technology, tries to "dumb us down" and keeps us busy with kids, mortgages, work etc, it's no wonder that we don't have time to have any interest in what is happening around us and this is what the "Global Elite" want. As long as we are kept busy with our mudane daily tasks and rituals, they can manipulate and control society the way they want. The other negative side of this equation is that if something doesn't affect us or our family directly, we are not interested.  So when a new law or bill is passed (even though we think it might not affect us) we carry on regardless. The gobal elites approach is this - if people are struggling to survive, they will not be in a position to rebel. If people have no money and are struggling to pay the bills and feed their family, they will not be interested in rebelling.

The "sheeple" mentality

Sheeple is a term of disparagement, in which people are likened to sheep.  It is often used to denote persons who voluntarily acquiesce to a perceived authority, or suggestion without sufficient research to understand fully the scope of the ramifications involved in that decision, and thus undermine their own human individuality or in other cases give up certain rights. The implication of sheeple is that as a collective, people believe whatever they are told, especially if told so by a perceived authority figure believed to be trustworthy, without processing it or doing adequate research to be sure that it is an accurate representation of the real world around them. The term is generally used in a political and sometimes in a spiritual sense.

The term is also used for those who are inordinately tolerant, or welcome government intrusion and regulation. In a column entitled "A Nation of Sheeple," columnist Walter E. Williams writes, "Americans sheepishly accepted all sorts of Transportation Security Administration nonsense. In the name of security, we've allowed fingernail clippers, eyeglass screwdrivers and toy soldiers to be taken from us prior to boarding a plane."  This usage emphasizes that Americans sheepishly accept all sorts of imposed official  nonsense. It describes those who blindly submit to the judgement of public servants or political parties as leading authorities, ignoring the reality that it is the individuals composing the body politic that empower the civil government through their acquiescence.

Who in their right mind would want to be branded sheeple?